The promises of the former East-Block economy are largely unfulfilled

W.Here or not Vladimir Putin sent Russian troops to Ukraine, the growing ice between East and West could signal a code in an era of increasing global economic integration that began with the fall of communism. In the mid-1980s, very few quarters of the world’s population lived in economies that could be considered open to foreign trade and capital flows, according to estimates published in 1995 by Jeffrey Sachs, Andrew Warner, Anders Asslund and Stanley Fisher. Less than a decade later, the numbers jumped above 50%, and three decades of rapid globalization continue to explode.

Listen to this story.
Enjoy more audio and podcasts iOS Or Android

Your browser

The open age has been good for many in the world. However, the performance of the former Eastern Bloc countries has been mixed. While some, like Poland and Latvia, grew faster than the rest of the emerging world between 1992 and 2019, Russia did slightly better than the much richer American economy and Ukraine did worse. Thirty years later, it is difficult to answer the question of why some succeeded and others failed.

In the critical years that followed, interim governments faced enormous challenges. Their economies lacked efficient labor and capital markets, and were burdened by uncompetitive manufacturing sectors and a prohibited macroeconomic picture. In the early 1990’s, inflation exceeded 1,000% in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, and 2,000% in Kazakhstan, Russia and Ukraine. Economists broadly agree on what needs to be done: open up economies to trade and market power, sell off state-owned enterprises, and create new institutions. However, they disagreed on how quickly the work should be done. Some, including Mr. Shass, argued for a rapid change একটি a method called “shock therapy” গণ calculating that rapid reform would quickly redistribute capital and put food on shelves faster. Critics thought a slower pace would accommodate more institutional reform and gain more political support.

In fact, most governments have wasted no time in starting trade and addressing macroeconomic challenges. Strategies for privatization are different. Some, like Estonia, have moved relatively slowly, with buyers matching one enterprise after another. Others, like Russia, favored rapid privatization through schemes that transferred shares to existing directors and employees (although the Russian state maintained partnerships in key industries such as oil and gas). It took the longest time to build a new organization. Preliminary results were mostly disappointing. Some countries have seen healthy growth: in Poland, GDP Per capita purchasing power parity has grown at an average annual rate of about 8% in 1992-98. Most did not. The main part of the former Soviet Union experienced a decline in income – in Russia, due to a financial crisis.

In the 2000s, some economists called for a rethinking of the fast-versus-slow debate. In 2006, Sergio Godoy and Joseph Stiglitz argued that rapid privatization was indeed associated with slower economic growth and that perseverance in developing high-quality legal institutions paid dividends. Similarly, the work published by Jan Svejnar in 2002 credits thorough reforms in places like Poland and Hungary for growth, protecting property rights and promoting good corporate governance.

As economists reassess, soil data has changed. From 1998 to 2013 the whole post-communist world enjoyed a roar. Annual per person GDP Growth has accelerated to 7% in the Baltic states and Ukraine, 8% in Russia and 13% in Turkmenistan. Russia’s resurgence has enabled it to regain some geopolitical status. And the strong growth of emerging markets as a whole, led by China, has forced economists to re-evaluate the importance of democracy and the rule of law.

Yet in recent years a different picture has come into focus. From 2014, the long surge in commodity prices came to an end and the economies that prevented their wagons from exporting wealth became fortunate. From 2013 to 2019, GDP Per capita shrinkage has occurred in Turkmenistan, where growth has slowed sharply in Russia and Kazakhstan. The economy stagnates, living standards stagnate, and corruption and inequality are hard to ignore. In January, frustration swept through the streets of Kazakhstan.

You never know how lucky you will be

In the joining economy IIn contrast, growth was strong. In 2016, GDP Every Romanian has surpassed Russia. Although much of the former Soviet Union depended on grain, gas and gold exports, Central Europe and the Baltics became deeply integrated with European labor and financial markets and became bound by the European supply chain. The sailing was not perfectly smooth; Over the past decade, the democratic governments of Poland and Hungary have weakened democratic institutions. But such measures are miles away from most authoritarian regimes in the post-Soviet world.

These heterogeneous experiences raise the difficult question: whether the quality of institutional reform is provided by economic and political means, for example, or other factors – such as the possibility of natural resource donation or a close relationship with it. I– How strong was the reform affected? Of course, the literature of transitional economics suggests that countries faced various internal constraints during the Reformation. An analysis of Russia’s experience in 1993 by Maxim Boyko, Andrei Schleifer, and Robert Vision stated that the country’s privatization scheme was in favor of insiders because management and staff enjoyed huge influence within the Russian parliament, without whose support privatization could not proceed.

Even then, external forces influence internal politics. The attractions of Western Europe have certainly shaped the decisions taken in Warsaw and Budapest, and continue in places like Belgrade, Tirana- and Kiev. The greed for a closer relationship with the rich West could be a powerful impetus for reform and an impetus for growth and democratization: a fact Mr Putin seems to have acknowledged very well. 3

Read more from Free Exchange, our column on economics:
China could soon become a high-income country (February 5)
Economists revise their views on robots and jobs (January 22)
Will remote work be stuck after the epidemic? (January 15)

For more expert analysis of the biggest stories in economics, business and markets, sign up for our weekly newsletter Money Talks.

This article was published in the print edition of the section entitled “Screening” in the section on finance and economics

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.